Monday, April 6, 2015

Child Vaccinations and Public Safety

         
            One rising controversial issue today is whether or not public schools in the United States should require kids to have vaccinations. The reason this topic is now a controversial issue is due to the fact that many people argue there are many harmful side effects to vaccinations. Although all 50 states require children to have been vaccinated, numerous people feel this is harmful to the well being of children.
            The exigence of my research paper is finding the truth about why public school vaccination requirements should remain in place. In order to achieve this, I will demonstrate why children without vaccinations are at more risk of death than children who allegedly experienced harmful side effects that trace back to the vaccine itself. For example, I will reveal why Meningitis is a lot more harmful than anaphylaxis or long-term seizures, which can occur after a vaccination (VaccinesProCon.org). While a seizure may occur after a vaccination, a child has a much greater possibility of surviving it rather than a case of meningitis or measles. Kids without the measles vaccination are 35% more likely to catch a case of measles than a child who is vaccinated (Scholastic.com). I will talk about how the additional pros, such as majority immunity, outweigh certain cons, such as special case adverse reactions. In addition, I will discuss how certain diseases are spread in schools to people do not have vaccinations Finally, I will close my argument by pointing to how child vaccinations protect future generations.
            The audience of this public vaccination debate consists of parents with younger kids, children, and educational authorities. This debate would further strengthen the educational authorities’ stance on required vaccinations because they already support it. This argument is likely to persuade parents of infants who are still deciding whether or not to vaccinate their child. It also might convince a parent to take their child to the doctor’s office to get them vaccinated. This issue does not concern couples not planning to have kids or families that are all mature in age. However, it does concern couples who plan on adopting.

            One of the most important factors in persuading my audience is refuting counter-arguments to the advantages of child vaccines. This way, it will not seem as if the author developed a closed-minded argument based solely on opinion. Here, I will talk about the studies that show a possible correlation between autism and vaccinations (VaccinesProCon.org).